Indonesia is home to diverse peoples who differ from one another in terms of physical appearance as well as social and cultural practices. The way such matters are understood is partly rooted in ideas developed by racial scientists working in the Netherlands Indies beginning in the late nineteenth century, who tried to develop systematic ways to define and identify distinctive races. Their work helped spread the idea that race had a scientific basis in anthropometry and craniology, and was central to people’s identity, but their encounters in the archipelago also challenged their ideas about race. In this new monograph, Fenneke Sysling draws on published works and private papers to describe the way Dutch racial scientists tried to make sense of the human diversity in the Indonesian archipelago. The making of racial knowledge, it contends, cannot be explained solely in terms of internal European intellectual developments. It was "on the ground" that ideas about race were made and unmade with a set of knowledge strategies that did not always combine well. Sysling describes how skulls were assembled through the colonial infrastructure, how measuring sessions were resisted, what role photography and plaster casting played in racial science and shows how these aspects of science in practice were entangled with the Dutch colonial Empire.
Much has been said about how Javanese puppet theatre, wayang kulit, richly reflects the Javanese world, and how changes and tensions in performance practice mirror those in culture and society. For decades, television has been as intensely part of the Javanese world as wayang. This book explores the ways two complex media and modes of being, seeing and fantasizing, with their different cultures, coexist and meet, and haunt or invade each other. It is what a Javanese commentator calls a “difficult marriage”: intimate on the one hand, deeply alienating on the other, institutionalized yet at the same time mercurial and shifting. This encounter is explored on many levels: from performance aesthetics and the technicalities of television production, to issues of time, space, light, place, and movement, to audience experience of live and televised performances, to the collaboration and struggle between performers and television producers. Central to the book are personal perspectives and experiences, as well as Javanese discussions surrounding the interaction between wayang and television and their cultures. They are brought into a conversation with reflections on media and technology by writers such as Karl Marx, Martin Heidegger, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Jacques Derrida, Paul Virilio, and James Siegel. Wayang’s relationship with television is considered in the context of the theatre’s intercourse with older and newer media, including electricity, radio, audio- and video-recording, the internet and social media. "Professor Jan Mrazek’s new book Wayang and Its Doubles is timely, original, and brilliant in its conceptualization…This book is an eye-opener for scholars of Cultural Studies as well as scholars of Indonesia." - Laurie Sears
Selama beberapa tahun belakangan, Mark Manson melalui blog nya yang sangat populer telah membantu mengoreksi harapan-harapan delusional kita, baik mengenai diri kita sendiri maupun dunia. Ia kini menuangkan buah pikirnya yang keren di dalam buku hebat ini.Argumennya, :tidak semua orang bisa menjadi luar biasa--ada para pemenang dan pecundang di masyarakat dan beberapa diantaranya tidak adil dan bukan akibat kesalahan Anda. MAnson mengajak kita untuk mengerti batasan-batasan diri dan menerimanya. Inilah sumber kekuatan yang paling nyata. Tepat saat kita mampu mengakrabi ketakutan, kegagalan dan ketidakpastian - tepat saat kita berhenti melarikan diri dan mengelak, dan mulai menghadapi kenyataan-kenyataan yang menyakitkan, saat itulah kita mulai menemukan keberanian dan kepercayaan diri yang selama ini kita cari dengan sekuat tenaga.